Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1600

reference
504-tree-1
name
1600
tree-preservation-order

undefined

504-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.037168 50.886065)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.037126 50.886061,-1.037128 50.886069,-1.037134 50.886077,-1.037143 50.886083,-1.037155 50.886087,-1.037168 50.886088,-1.037181 50.886087,-1.037193 50.886083,-1.037203 50.886077,-1.037209 50.886070,-1.037211 50.886061,-1.037209 50.886053,-1.037203 50.886045,-1.037194 50.886039,-1.037182 50.886035,-1.037169 50.886034,-1.037156 50.886035,-1.037144 50.886039,-1.037134 50.886045,-1.037128 50.886052,-1.037126 50.886061)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL